Kant, Anti-Supersessionism, and the Holocaust

Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 6 (1):80-96 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is common to accuse Christian supersessionism of responsibility for the Holocaust. This article qualifies this claim by arguing that the theological ideology that directly preceded and aided the Holocaust was unequivocally hostile to this traditional Christian doctrine. It is German neo-Marcionism – which deliberately fought against replacement theology – that provides a direct religious context for the Nazi solution to the Jewish question. Kant appears in this picture as the first modern German Christian who consistently pursued an anti-supersessionist agenda of “purifying” Christianity by radically severing it from its Jewish roots.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Christian Supersessionism, Zionism, and the Contemporary Scene.Shaul Magid - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (1):104-141.
Feminist Theology and the Holocaust.Sara Litchfield - 2010 - Feminist Theology 18 (3):332-340.
Den teologiska Holocaustlitteraturen.Karl-Johan Illman - 1982 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 4 (1):23-29.
On Metaphysics and Supersessionism.Nicholas Mitchell - 2023 - Journal for Continental Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):188-208.
Anti-Holocaustlitteraturen og dens baggrund.Ragnar Kvam - 1982 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 4 (1):11-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
10 (#1,221,414)

6 months
5 (#711,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wojciech Kozyra
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references