Erkenntnis 48 (2-3):311-324 (1998)
States of affairs are considered as ontologically basic. Different from similar accounts, these states of affairs are introduced as simple occurrences or items of a certain kind. The ontological importance of these occurrences lies in their semantical function as exemplars for the introduction of the most basic linguistic devices. The ontological basis proposed is particularist. Universals are an aspect of our routine behaviour as we neglect the differences of particular properties of things. Abstract objects are produced in our routine, language-dependent operations if we leave aside the fact that we usually operate with some definite material.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Ethics Logic Ontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Consequentialist Teleology and the Valuation of States of Affairs.Robert F. Card - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):253-265.
Nomic Universals and Particular Causal Relations: Which Are Basic and Which Are Derived?John Bolender - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):405-410.
Does Armstrong Need States of Affairs?James D. Rissler - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):193 – 209.
Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem.Holger Leerhoff - 2008 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):249-264.
Possible Objects and Possible States of Affairs in Wittgenstein's Tractatus.Alberto Voltolini - 2002 - In P. Frascolla (ed.), Tractatus logico-philosophicus: Sources, Themes, Perspectives. Università degli studi della Basilicata. pp. 129-153.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #194,987 of 2,164,580 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,580 )
How can I increase my downloads?