Arguing About Disability: Philosophical Perspectives

Routledge (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Disability is a thorny and muddled concept and philosophical issues have often been overlooked in favour of the sociological amongst the controversy. Arguing about Disability fills that gap by offering analysis and debate concerning the moral nature of institutions, policy and practice, and their significance for disabled people and society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics: Philosophy meets disability.P. Louhiala - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (9):570-572.
Disability, Options and Well-Being.Thomas Crawley - 2020 - Utilitas 32 (3):316-334.
Reply to Guy Kahane and Julian Savulescu.Elizabeth Barnes - 2016 - Res Philosophica 93 (1):295-309.
Debating disability.Tom Shakespeare - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (1):11-14.
Disability and Moral Responsibility.Simo Vehmas - 2011 - TRAMES 15 (2):156-167.
Dimensions of Disability.Simo Vehmas - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):34-40.
Is Disability a Neutral Condition?Jeffrey M. Brown - 2016 - Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (2):188-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references