- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge
Philosophical Review 107 (2):324 (1998)
Abstract
Once upon a time, logic was the philosopher’s tool for analyzing scientific reasoning. Nowadays, probability and statistics have largely replaced logic, and their most popular application—Bayesianism—has replaced the qualitative deductive relationship between a hypothesis h and evidence e with a quantitative measure of h’s probability in light of e.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge by Deborah G. Mayo. [REVIEW]Theodore Porter - 1998 - Isis 89:357-358.
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge.Deborah Mayo - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):455-459.
Review. Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Deborah Mayo.Haṡok Chang - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):455-459.
Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. [REVIEW]Harold I. Brown - 2001 - International Studies in Philosophy 33 (4):135-137.
Error and the growth of experimental knowledge.Deborah Mayo - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (1):455-459.
Matti Sintonen, Review of Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge by Deborah Mayo. [REVIEW]Matti Sintonen - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):370-372.
When do empirical data provide reliable evidence for a hypothesis (theory)? A review of Deborah G. Mayo's Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge.A. Spanos - 2001 - Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (3):443-453.
Review of Deborah G. Mayo, Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. [REVIEW]Adam La Caze - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-03-18
Downloads
54 (#288,184)
6 months
17 (#203,231)
2012-03-18
Downloads
54 (#288,184)
6 months
17 (#203,231)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Costs of HARKing.Mark Rubin - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 73 (2):535-560.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
A New Proof of the Likelihood Principle.Greg Gandenberger - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (3):475-503.
Experimental Artefacts.Carl F. Craver & Talia Dan-Cohen - 2024 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 75 (1):253-274.
A new critique of theological interpretations of physical cosmology.A. Grünbaum - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):1-43.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo