Thinking and Reasoning 24 (1):97-116 (2018)

Why does discourse so often seem shallow, with people arguing past one another more than with one another? Might contributing causes be individual and logical rather than only dialogical? We consider here whether there exist errors in reasoning that could be particularly damaging in their effects on argumentive discourse. In particular, we examine implications for discourse of two such errors – explanation as a replacement for evidence and neglecting the likelihood of multiple causes contributing to an outcome. In Studies 1 and 2, we show these errors to be prevalent in a cross section of adults, as well as samples of community college students and young adolescents, with minimal age-related improvement. They also occur, although less frequently, among a sample of highly educated adults, and in Study 3, we examine their role in the discourse of college-educated adults. We point finally to evidence that these individual reasoning errors are potentially addressable through education.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
DOI 10.1080/13546783.2017.1388846
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,579
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Evaluation of Evidence in Causal Inference.Miriam W. Schustack & Robert J. Sternberg - 1981 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110 (1):101-120.
Dialogue Theory for Critical Thinking.Douglas N. Walton - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (2):169-184.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Choose Your Evidence.Deanna Kuhn & Anahid S. Modrek - forthcoming - Science & Education.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Coordinating Own and Other Perspectives in Argument.Deanna Kuhn & Wadiya Udell - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (2):90 – 104.
Towards the Use of Automated Reasoning in Discourse Disambiguation.Claire Gardent & Bonnie Webber - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (4):487-509.
Situational Constraints on Normative Reasoning.Earl Hunt - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):680-680.
Competing Conceptions of Diagnostic Reasoning – is There a Way Out?Reidun Førde - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):59-72.
Analogy in Legal Discourse.Bartosz Brozek - 2008 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 94 (2):188-201.
Reasoning in Listening.Kenneth Olson & Gilbert Plumer - 2003 - In Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard & A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat. pp. 803-806.


Added to PP index

Total views
30 ( #369,784 of 2,461,839 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,803 of 2,461,839 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes