Thinking tools 4: How to sound like a guru: Law Thinking tools

Think 2 (4):85-87 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thinking Tools is a regular feature that introduces pointers on thinking clearly and rigorously. Here l explain some of the techniques commonly used by ‘gurus’ to dupe people into thinking they have something profound to say.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s1477175600000671

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Thinking Tools: The Sherlock Holmes Fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2008 - Think 6 (17-18):219-221.
Thinking tools: Weak analogy: Law Thinking Tools.Stephen Law - 2007 - Think 5 (15):59-60.
Thinking tools: The fallacy of affirming the consequent: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2004 - Think 3 (7):31-32.
Thinking tools: The genetic fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2006 - Think 5 (13):23-24.
Thinking tools: The relativist fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2005 - Think 3 (9):57-58.
Thinking tools: The lottery fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2005 - Think 4 (11):65-66.
Thinking tools: The gambler's fallacy: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2003 - Think 2 (5):51-52.
Thinking Tools 2: Superstition and the Miser's Favourite: Law Thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2002 - Think 1 (2):99-101.
Thinking tools: Suppressed evidence: Law thinking tools.Stephen Law - 2008 - Think 7 (20):105-105.
Thinking Tools: The prosecutor's Fallacy: Bebbington Thinking tools.Dene Bebbington - 2007 - Think 5 (14):107-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
26 (#597,230)

6 months
8 (#506,524)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references