Is There Only One Correct System of Modal Logic?

&
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 33 (1):23-56 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/aristoteliansupp/33.1.23

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is There Only One Correct System of Modal Logic?E. J. Lemmon & G. P. Henderson - 1959 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 33 (1):23-56.
Symposium: Is There Only One Correct System of Modal Logic?E. J. Lemmon & G. P. Henderson - 1959 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 33 (2):23 - 56.
E. J. Lemmon. Symposium: Is there only one correct system of modal logic? I.Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXXIII, London1959, pp. 23–40. - G. P. Henderson. Is there only one correct system of modal logic? II. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXXIII, London1959, pp. 41–56. [REVIEW]E. J. Lemmon & G. P. Henderson - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):306-306.
E. J. Lemmon. Symposium: Is there only one correct system of modal logic? I.Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXXIII, London1959, pp. 23–40. - G. P. Henderson. Is there only one correct system of modal logic? II. Aristotelian Society supplementary volume XXXIII, London1959, pp. 41–56. [REVIEW]Sörén Halldén - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (2):306-306.
Review: E. J. Lemmon, An Extension Algebra and the Modal System T; E. J. Lemmon, Algebraic Semantics for Modal Logics. [REVIEW]David Makinson - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):136-137.
E. J. Lemmon. Quantifiers and modal operators. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 58 , pp. 245–268.Arnould Bayart - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (2):275-276.
E. J. Lemmon. An extension algebra and the modal system T.Notre Dame Journal of formal logic, vol. 1 , pp. 3–12. - E. J. Lemmon. Algebraic semantics for modal logics.The journal of symbolic logic, vol. 31 , pp. 46–65; pp. 191–218. [REVIEW]David Makinson - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):136-137.
Review: Lennart Aqvist, Results Concerning some Modal Systems that Contain S2; E. J. Lemmon, Some Results on Finite Axiomatizability in Modal Logic; E. J. Lemmon, A Note on Hallden-Incompleteness. [REVIEW]M. J. Cresswell - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (4):648-649.
Ryle G.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 20–29.Lewy C.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 30–39.Popper K. R.. Why are the calculuses of logic and arithmetic applicable to reality? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume XX, London 1946, pp. 40–60. [REVIEW]Albert A. Bennett - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (2):135-135.
Review: E. J. Lemmon, Quantifiers and Modal Operators. [REVIEW]Arnould Bayart - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (2):275-276.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
8 (#1,334,194)

6 months
6 (#701,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The logic of 'being informed' revisited and revised.Patrick Allo - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (3):417-434.
The interpretation of some Lewis systems of modal logic.M. J. Cresswell - 1967 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):198 – 206.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references