- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Cost-Benefit Analysis Defended
Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly 3 (3):6 (1983)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Limits of Cost-Benefit Analysis.Mark Sagoff - 1981 - Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly 1 (3):9.
Regulatory Review and Cost-Benefit Analysis.Mark Sagoff - 2009 - Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly 29 (3/4):21.
Cost-benefit analysis and public policy formulation.Vincent Vaccaro - 1981 - In Norman Bowie (ed.), Ethical Issues in Government. Temple University Press. pp. 146--62.
Science, democracy, and public policy.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2):255-264.
The Moral Justification of Benefit/Cost Analysis.Donald C. Hubin - 1994 - Economics and Philosophy 10 (2):169-194.
Orthodox truthmaker theory cannot be defended by cost/benefit analysis.Philip Goff - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):45-50.
Guiding Covid policy: cost-benefit analysis and beyond.Jonathan Aldred - forthcoming - Cambridge Journal of Economics.
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Statistical Decision Theory, and Environmental Policy.Mancur Olson - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:372 - 394.
How to take deontological concerns seriously in risk-cost-benefit analysis: a re-interpretation of the precautionary principle.S. D. John - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):221-224.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-11-21
Downloads
5 (#847,061)
6 months
4 (#1,635,958)
2022-11-21
Downloads
5 (#847,061)
6 months
4 (#1,635,958)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Regulation, Compensation, and the Loss of Life: What Cost-Benefit Analysis Really Requires.Ty Raterman - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (1):97-118.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo