Daniel A. Dombrowski, Babies and Beasts: The Argument from Marginal Cases Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 18 (4):250-252 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the argument from marginal cases obtuse?Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):223–232.
The Argument from Marginal Cases: is species a relevant difference.Julia Tanner - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):225-235.
Marginal Humans, The Argument From Kinds, And The Similarity Argument.Julia Tanner - 2006 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):47-63.
The Replaceability Argument.Daniel Dombrowski - 2001 - Process Studies 30 (1):22-35.
Animals, handicapped children and the tragedy of marginal cases.J. L. Nelson - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (4):191-193.
Deconstructionism and the ontological argument.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2000 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 21 (1):3 - 18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-15

Downloads
2 (#1,800,073)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references