John Lippitt
University of Hertfordshire
Kierkegaard’s Works of Love has often been accused of being unable to deal adequately with ‘special relationships’. This debate has re-emerged in a fresh form in a recent disagreement in the secondary literature between M. Jamie Ferreira and Sharon Krishek. Krishek charges Ferreira with failing to acknowledge some important conflicts in Kierkegaard’s account of preferential love. In this article, I argue that some key passages are indeed insufficiently addressed in Ferreira’s account. Yet ultimately, I argue, Krishek ends up condemning the Kierkegaard of Works of Love unfairly. As a solution to Krishek’s concerns, I present a defence of Kierkegaard’s position centred round the image of God as a ‘filter’ through which our loves must pass. Also, while acknowledging that Krishek raises some important questions for Ferreira’s account, I outline a possible response, based in part on Kierkegaard’s idea that neighbour love is only a ‘sketch’ until brought to fruition in any given manifestation of concrete love. Ultimately, I claim, Kierkegaard’s position in Works of Love can indeed be defended from Krishek’s critique
Keywords God  Kierkegaard  Neighbour-love  Preferential love  Self-love
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-012-9364-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,756
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Sickness Unto Death.Søen Kierkegaard & Walter Lowrie - 1941 - Princeton University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #149,935 of 2,334,030 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #194,495 of 2,334,030 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes