Perilous thoughts: comment on van Fraassen

Philosophical Studies 143 (1):25-32 (2009)

Authors
Helen Longino
Stanford University
Abstract
Bas van Fraassen’s empiricist reading of Perrin’s achievement invites the question: whose doubts about atoms did Perrin put to rest? This comment recontextualizes the argument and applies the notion of empirical grounding to some contemporary work in behavioral biology.
Keywords Jean Baptiste Perrin  Scientific realism  Bas van Fraassen  Empiricism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9316-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,046
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Explanation and the Theory of Questions.Charles B. Cross - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (2):237 - 260.
On Rejecting Foss's Image of Van Fraassen.Warren Bourgeois - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):303-308.
Acceptance Without Belief.Patrick Maher - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:381-392.
A Paradox for Empiricism (?).Igor Douven - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):297.
Does Hypatia Rock Boats?Helen Bequaert Holmes - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (3):162 - 164.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
68 ( #118,233 of 2,259,507 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #324,289 of 2,259,507 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature