Subjunctive conditionals’ local contexts

Linguistics and Philosophy 42 (3):207-221 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philippe Schlenker gives a method of deriving local contexts from an expression’s classical semantics. In this paper I show that this method, when applied to the traditional variably strict semantics for subjunctive conditionals of Robert Stalnaker, David Lewis, and Angelika Kratzer, delivers an empirically incorrect prediction. The prediction is that the antecedent of a conditional should have the whole domain of possible worlds as its local context and therefore should be allowed to have only necessary presuppositions. In the later part of the paper, I suggest the outlines of a solution to the problem. The solution involves adding a shifting contextual restriction on the domain of possible worlds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-09

Downloads
77 (#220,930)

6 months
9 (#355,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Mackay
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

Attitude verbs’ local context.Kyle Blumberg & Simon Goldstein - 2022 - Linguistics and Philosophy 46 (3):483-507.
Conditional Collapse.Sam Carter - 2023 - Mind 132 (528):971-1004.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scorekeeping in a language game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 179.
Indicative conditionals.Robert Stalnaker - 1975 - Philosophia 5 (3):269-286.

View all 9 references / Add more references