Unintended Consequences or Pre-existing Barriers? A Commentary on Barnhill and Devine

Public Health Ethics 11 (3):phy010 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this case discussion, Barnhill and Devine collect and present a significant amount of recent research on the various reasons why people struggle to succeed in weight loss programmes. Specifically, the authors focus on what they call ‘behavioural weight loss interventions’, which are ‘research, clinical or public health efforts to promote individual healthy eating and physical activity behaviours’. As defined, this is a very broad category of interventions and presumably includes all kinds of dieting and weight loss programmes or promotion efforts short of private or independently chosen programmes. The authors argue, in a nutshell, that these clinical, research, and public health interventions have low efficacy, and while they may have some health or other benefits, the balance of evidence presented shows that they harm people in multiple ways.

Similar books and articles

On Surprises, Stigma, Sports, Sprouts.Inez de Beaufort - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (3):362-363.
Public Health Ethics and Rights in Healthcare Programmes.Joseph Mfutso-Bengo, Elizabeth Bukusi & Eva Mfutso-Bengo - 2018 - In Nico Nortjé, Jo-Celene De Jongh & Willem A. Hoffmann (eds.), African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 215-234.
Questioning the ethics of promoting weight loss in clinical practice.Andria Bianchi & Maria Ricupero - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 3 (1):95-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-21

Downloads
230 (#89,966)

6 months
58 (#92,764)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kathryn MacKay
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references