Gaunilo Argues that Anselm is Wrong

In Brian Davies (ed.), Philosophy of religion: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anselm Replies to Gaunilo.Anselm of Canterbury - 2000 - In Brian Davies (ed.), Philosophy of religion: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ontological arguments : Anselm and Gaunilo.Byard Bennett - 2022 - In Mark A. Lamport (ed.), The Rowman & Littlefield Handbook of Philosophy and Religion. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Was Gaunilo Right in his Criticism of Anselm? A Contemporary Perspective.Woleński Jan - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):101--111.
Gaunilo referiert Anselm. Aus dem Tagesgeschäft des Rekonstrukteurs.Geo Siegwart - 2013 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):1-29.
Anselm and Gaunilo on the ‘Lost Island’.Stephen T. Davis - 1975 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):435-448.
Gaunilo referiert Anselm. Aus dem Tagesgeschäft des Rekonstrukteurs.Geo Siegwart - 2013 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (27):1-29.
Reflections on Anselm and Gaunilo.Stephen Read - 1981 - International Philosophical Quarterly 21 (4):437-438.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references