Bioethics 23 (7):385-393 (2009)
AbstractIn this paper I analyse the ethical implications of the two main competing methodologies in genomic research. I do not aim to provide another contribution from the mainstream legal and public policy perspective; rather I offer a novel approach in which I analyse and describe the patent-and-publish regime (the proprietary regime) led by biologist J. Craig Venter and the 'open-source' methodologies led by biotechnology Nobel laureate John Sulston. The 'open-source methodologies' arose in biotechnology as an alternative to the patent-and-publish regime in the wake of the explosion in computer technology. Indeed, the tremendous increase in computer technology has generated a corresponding increase in the pace of genomics research. I conclude this paper by arguing that while the patent-and-publish method is a transactional method based on the exchange of extrinsic goods (patents in exchange for research funds), the free and open-source methodology (FLOSS) 1 is a transformational method based on a visionary ideal of science, which leads to prioritizing intrinsic goods in scientific research over extrinsic goods.
Similar books and articles
The morality of scientific openness.Christian Munthe & Stellan Welin - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):411-428.
How the role of computing is driving new genetics public policy.Antonio Marturano & Ruth Chadwick - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):43-53.
Global status and trends in intellectual property claims: genomics, proteomics and biotechnology.Paul Oldham - 2004 - .
It’s About Scientific Secrecy, Dummy: A Better Equilibrium Among Genomics Patenting, Scientific Research and Health Care. [REVIEW]Miriam Bentwich - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):263-284.
Are life patents ethical? Conflict between catholic social teaching and agricultural biotechnology's patent regime.Keith Douglass Warner - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):301-319.
Biodiversity and the patent system : towards international indicators. Submission to the executive secretary of the convention on biological diversity.Paul Oldham - 2006 - .
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Patent Ethics: The Misalignment of Views Between the Patent System and the Wider Society.Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Anders Braarud Hanssen, Hanne Marie Nielsen & Ingrid Olesen - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1551-1576.
Structural genomics and the organisation of open science.Creso Sá & Merli Tamtik - 2011 - Genomics, Society and Policy 7 (1):1-15.
References found in this work
No references found.