Mathematical Beauty and the Evolution of the Standards of Mathematical Proof

J. W. McAllister

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Categories

Evolutionary Biology in Philosophy of Biology

Mathematical Proof in Philosophy of Mathematics

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

This entry has no external links. Add one.

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Similar books and articles

Beauty and Revolution in Science by James W. McAllister. [REVIEW]Thomas Nickles - 1997 - Isis 88:746-747.

Beauty and Revolution in Science. James W. McAllister.Thomas Nickles - 1997 - Isis 88 (4):746-747.

Beauty & Revolution in Science. By James W. McAllister.S. Shostak - 2001 - The European Legacy 6 (6):859-860.

Review of James W. McAllister: Beauty & revolution in science. [REVIEW]Katherine Hawley - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):297-299.

On certain Leibniz's observation concerning the substantiation of mathematical statements.Krystyna Blachowicz - 1983 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 12 (4):143-145.

The dialectical tier of mathematical proof.Andrew Aberdein - 2011 - In Frank Zenker (ed.), Argumentation: Cognition & Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18--21, 2011. OSSA.

Schoonheid AlS argument: James W. McAllister, beauty and revolution in science, ithaca, etc. [REVIEW]T. Derksen - 1999 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 91 (3):168-173.

Mathematical rigor, proof gap and the validity of mathematical inference.Yacin Hamami - 2014 - Philosophia Scientiae 18 (1):7-26.

Beauty and Revolution in Science.James W. McAllister - 1996 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

What are the limits of mathematical explanation? Interview with Charles McCarty by Piotr Urbańczyk.David Charles McCarty & Piotr Urbańczyk - 2016 - Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 60:119-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
33 (#472,388)

6 months
33 (#121,480)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Aesthetic values in science.Milena Ivanova - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (10):e12433.

Beauty Is Not Simplicity: An Analysis of Mathematicians' Proof Appraisals.Matthew Inglis & Andrew Aberdein - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (1):87-109.

Mathematical Beauty, Understanding, and Discovery.Carlo Cellucci - 2015 - Foundations of Science 20 (4):339-355.

Are Aesthetic Judgements Purely Aesthetic? Testing the Social Conformity Account.Matthew Inglis & Andrew Aberdein - 2020 - ZDM 52 (6):1127-1136.

Recent work on aesthetics of science.James W. McAllister - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):7 – 11.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The four-color problem and its philosophical significance.Thomas Tymoczko - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):57-83.

Proofs and pictures.James Robert Brown - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):161-180.

Analogy in quantum theory: From insight to nonsense.Mario Bunge - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (4):265-286.

Erwin Schrödinger, Anschaulichkeit, and quantum theory.Henk W. de Regt - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (4):461-481.

Erwin Schrödinger, Anschaulichkeit, and quantum theory.Henk W. de Regt - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (4):461-481.

View all 11 references / Add more references