Modality and Sovereignty

Philosophia Christi 12 (2):289-296 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two important aspects of O’Connor’s Theism and Ultimate Explanation are explored. The first is whether God’s existence should be considered ontologically necessary. I suggest that although existence is essential to God, it is not a matter of ontological necessity. The second is whether prior to creating God deliberates about what universe or universes to create. I argue that he does not, that to say he does is to mistake creation for a kind of manufacturing. Implications of these claims regarding divine sovereignty are briefly discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
21 (#727,964)

6 months
5 (#837,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh J. McCann
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references