Sophistry and Philosophy in Plato’s Republic

Polis 22 (2):265-286 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The Republic presents the sophist in three ways: through an example , an abstract description in Book Six, and an image . Thrasymachus presents a coherent understanding of justice and is not inconsistent, as some commentators have argued. Both the philosopher and the sophist are intellectuals who value wisdom, but on Socrates' account, the sophist equates the necessary with the good. The philosopher separates the necessary and the good, and orients himself to a truth outside of himself. However, the Republic suggests that there is no meta-philosophical position by which the philosopher and the sophist can be judged. The separation of the philosopher from the sophist makes sense only from the viewpoint of the philosopher. Socrates' emphasis on the incompleteness of wisdom also suggests that the philosopher's understanding of his own activity must remain open to change



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

2 (#1,403,216)

6 months
1 (#454,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marina McCoy
Boston College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references