Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):388-415 (2020)

Abstract
In a recent article, Barrett & Halvorson define a notion of equivalence for first-order theories, which they call “Morita equivalence.” To argue that Morita equivalence is a reasonable measure of “theoretical equivalence,” they make use of the claim that Morita extensions “say no more” than the theories they are extending. The goal of this article is to challenge this central claim by raising objections to their argument for it and by showing why there is good reason to think that the claim itself is false. In light of these criticisms, this article develops a natural way for the advocate of Morita equivalence to respond. I prove that this response makes her criterion a special case of bi-interpretability, an already well-established barometer of theoretical equivalence. I conclude by providing reasons why the advocate of Morita equivalence should opt for a notion of theoretical equivalence that is defined in terms of interpretability rather than Morita extensions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1755020319000303
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,864
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Morita Equivalence.Thomas William Barrett & Hans Halvorson - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):556-582.
Logicism, Interpretability, and Knowledge of Arithmetic.Sean Walsh - 2014 - Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):84-119.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Morita Equivalence and Interpretability.Paul Anh Mceldowney - forthcoming - Review of Symbolic Logic:1-27.
Morita Equivalence.Thomas William Barrett & Hans Halvorson - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):556-582.
Categorical Quasivarieties Via Morita Equivalence.Keith A. Kearnes - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):839-856.
Abductive Equivalence in First-Order Logic.Katsumi Inoue & Chiaki Sakama - 2006 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2):333-346.
Theoretical Equivalence as Interpretative Equivalence.Kevin Coffey - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (4):821-844.
A Syntactic Characterization of Morita Equivalence.Dimitris Tsementzis - 2017 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (4):1181-1198.
Glymour and Quine on Theoretical Equivalence.Thomas William Barrett & Hans Halvorson - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (5):467-483.
Σ 1 0 and Π 1 0 Equivalence Structures.Douglas Cenzer, Valentina Harizanov & Jeffrey B. Remmel - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (7):490-503.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-14

Total views
5 ( #1,151,851 of 2,433,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #463,180 of 2,433,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes