The large structures of grothendieck founded on finite-order arithmetic

Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):296-325 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The large-structure tools of cohomology including toposes and derived categories stay close to arithmetic in practice, yet published foundations for them go beyond ZFC in logical strength. We reduce the gap by founding all the theorems of Grothendieck’s SGA, plus derived categories, at the level of Finite-Order Arithmetic, far below ZFC. This is the weakest possible foundation for the large-structure tools because one elementary topos of sets with infinity is already this strong.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Finite mathematics.Shaughan Lavine - 1995 - Synthese 103 (3):389 - 420.
Algebraic Methods and Bounded Formulas.Domenico Zambella - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (1):37-48.
A strong polarized relation.Shimon Garti & Saharon Shelah - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (3):766-776.
Incompatible Ω-Complete Theories.Peter Koellner & W. Hugh Woodin - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (4):1155 - 1170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-03

Downloads
46 (#106,786)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colin McLarty
Case Western Reserve University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proof Theory.Gaisi Takeuti - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (1):160-161.
The strength of Mac Lane set theory.A. R. D. Mathias - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 110 (1-3):107-234.
Topos Theory.P. T. Johnstone - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (2):448-450.

View all 6 references / Add more references