- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Miracle Argument for realism: An important lesson to be learned by generalizing from Carrier’s counter-examples
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):267-282 (1991)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
What is wrong with the miracle argument??☆.Martin Carrier - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (1):23-36.
What is structural realism?James Ladyman - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):409-424.
A new twist to the No Miracles Argument for the success of science.K. Brad Wray - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 69:86-89.
Quantum theory and the flight from realism.Yemima Ben-Menahem - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (3):587-591.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy: A dialogue on realism and constructivism.Robert Nola - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (5):689-727.
Realism, functions, and the a priori: Ernst Cassirer's philosophy of science.Jeremy Heis - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 48:10-19.
Science, truth and history, Part I. Historiography, relativism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.Nick Tosh - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):675-701.
For or against structural realism? A verdict from high energy physics.Antigone M. Nounou - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 49:84-101.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
61 (#270,664)
6 months
8 (#415,703)
2010-09-02
Downloads
61 (#270,664)
6 months
8 (#415,703)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Using Meta‐Scientific Studies to Clarify or Resolve Questions in the Philosophy and History of Science.David Faust & Paul E. Meehl - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S185-S196.
What is right with the miracle argument: Establishing a taxonomy of natural kinds.Martin Carrier - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (3):391-409.
Cliometric metatheory III: Peircean consensus, verisimilitude, and asymptotic method.Paul E. Meehl - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):615-643.
Afirmando o conseqüente: uma defesa do realismo científico (?!).Silvio Seno Chibeni - 2006 - Scientiae Studia 4 (2):221-249.
Empirical tests of scientific realism: A quantitative framework.James W. McAllister - 2023 - Metaphilosophy 54 (4):507-522.
References found in this work
Existential hypotheses. Realistic versus phenomenalistic interpretations.Herbert Feigl - 1950 - Philosophy of Science 17 (1):35-62.
What is wrong with the miracle argument??☆.Martin Carrier - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (1):23-36.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-x7cz5 uwo