Choice and circumstance

Ethics 109 (1):154-165 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An applicant to our graduate program in philosophy, accepted as well by one (but only one) other graduate program, wrestles with his decision. Finally he decides to attend the other program, but he thanks me for our offer, telling me, "I'm glad that at least I had a choice." I want to focus a bit on these two stories, for while the central conclusion in each -- something turning on the importance of choice -- is initially compelling, it is also, on reflection, philosophically puzzling. It is compelling, because many of us in similar positions would share this response; phenomenologically, it feels right to us. We want to believe that the central facts of our lives -- whether or not we have children, where we are educated, what career we follow, with 1 whom we join as partners -- contain in them some fundamental element of our own selection and decision. We will be exploring below exactly what will turn out to be important here, and why, but for now, in our pre-reflective grasp of this phenomenon, we can say that it seems to have something to do with the value we place on autonomy, self-governance, self-authorship. We want, metaphorically speaking, to write the story of our own lives. But let me now begin to draw out why I find this insistence on the importance of choice, which so many of us would share, to be so puzzling. Both individuals, in both stories, want to be offered a certain additional option in order to have -- or at least to feel that they have? -- a choice about what they are going to do next. But, on the one hand, we could argue that, even with this added option, they still don't have a "real" choice -- they don't have the choice of doing what they most want to do; and on the other hand, one could argue that even without the added option, they always had some choice. Let me explain. In the first story, my friend certainly doesn't have open to her the option that would have been her first choice (and, in our society, what we might call the standard choice, the most frequently chosen option): to produce a biological child with her partner in a happy marriage..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Choice and circumstance.Mills Claudia - 1998 - In Stephen Everson (ed.), Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 109--1.
Choice and circumstance.Hillel Steiner - 1997 - Ratio 10 (3):296–312.
Paternalism, French fries and the weak-willed Witness.Nir Eyal - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):353-354.
Against autonomy: justifying coercive paternalism.Sarah Conly - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):349-349.
Husserl’s personalist ethics.Ullrich Melle - 2007 - Husserl Studies 23 (1):1-15.
Surprised Divide.Anonymous One - 2023 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 13 (2):70-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#355,543)

6 months
7 (#491,733)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Autonomy as Non‐alienation, Autonomy as Sovereignty, and Politics.David Enoch - 2021 - Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):143-165.
What the Liberal State Should Tolerate Within Its Borders.Andrew Jason Cohen - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):479-513.
Autonomy and Organ Sales, Revisited.J. S. Taylor - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):632-648.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references