Attribution of concepts and problems with anachronism

History and Theory 50 (3):303-327 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTMany long‐standing debates about anachronistic concept‐attributions derive from an essentialist understanding of concepts that is often difficult to sustain for metaphysical or epistemological reasons. The intentionalist alternative to essentialism elaborated in this article successfully clarifies and avoids many standard problems with anachronism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The essence of essentialism.George E. Newman & Joshua Knobe - 2019 - Mind and Language 34 (5):585-605.
Prototypes in emotion concepts.Paul Wilson & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk - 2023 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19 (1):125-143.
Fractal concepts and recognition: Hegelian intersectional feminism.Małgorzata Anna Maciejewska - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Artifacts and Essentialism.Susan A. Gelman - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):449-463.
Theory of Concepts.Erich Rast - 2012 - In Sven Ove Hansson & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), Introduction to Formal Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 241-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
29 (#569,108)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references