Quid juris and judicial imputation
In Camilla Serck-Hanssen and Beatrix Himmelmann (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Kant Congress ‘The Court of Reason’ (Oslo, 6-9 August 2019). Berlin, Germany: pp. 1835-1844 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant explains the purpose of the transcendental deduction of the categories by referring to the practice of legal deduction (KrV, A 84/B 116). However, he does not elaborate the details of the analogy and the reader is left to fill in the blanks concerning legal deductions and their supposed similarities with transcendental deductions. In this paper, I suggest we use judicial imputation to clarify Kant’s analogy between transcendental and legal deductions. My claim is that the core of the analogy is not the similarities between the acquisition of property and that of concepts but rather similarities in the application of a law to a deed.
|
Keywords | Immanuel Kant Critique of Pure Reason Judicial Imputation Transcendental Deduction |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kant's Tribunal of Reason: Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason.Sofie Møller - 2020 - Cambridge University Press.
On the Normative Aspect of Concepts As Rules: An Essay on Kant’s Transcendental Deduction.Predrag Cicovacki - 1995 - Idealistic Studies 25 (1):25-49.
3. The Quid Juris.Dennis Schulting - 2018 - In Kant’s Deduction From Apperception: An Essay on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. De Gruyter. pp. 28-62.
Der Begriff der Zurechnung in Immanuel Kants „Philosophia Practica Universalis“.Martin Heuser - 2020 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 106 (2):265-300.
Kant's Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.Ian Proops - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):209-229.
Genealogy and Jurisprudence in Fichte’s Genetic Deduction of the Categories.G. Anthony Bruno - 2018 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 35 (1):77-96.
Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.
The First Half of the Transcendental Deduction in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (B).Hirotaka Nakano - 2008 - Ideas Y Valores 57 (137):93-112.
Is Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Qual o Problema da Dedução Transcendental Na Crítica da Razão Pura?Paulo R. Licht dos Santos - 2016 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 72 (2-3):401-434.
Expansion of Self-Consciousness in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.Olga Lenczewska - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (4):554–594.
Hans Kelsen's Concept of Normative Imputation.Ian Bryan Peter Langford - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (1):85-110.
Hans Kelsen's Concept of Normative Imputation.Peter Langford & Ian Bryan - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (1):85-110.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-12-13
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
2021-12-13
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.