The Adjudication of Utilitarianism and Rights in the Sphere of Health Care

Dissertation, The University of Oklahoma (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation serves as a monograph on the moral and social implications of a utilitarian-based system of health care which recognizes and takes rights seriously. Though the design and claims are stated primarily in terms of utilitarianism, admittedly, there are elements of communitarian, deontological, and rights theories which have been incorporated. ;Such a commingling of theoretical elements, under the claim of being utilitarian, may seem ambiguous, however, it is my contention that such inclusions only serve to enhance the plausible nature of this sphere-specific form of utilitarianism and the adjudication of rights. Additionally, though there are other components of theories included, the basis of utilitarianism still serves as the foundation by which all other actions, decisions, and values are judged. ;While it is true that utilitarianism offers a standard for all areas of life, the idea of examining a sphere or environment of utility, in this case, the utility associated with the sphere of health care, allows for the good to be clearly defined. One primary weakness of classical utilitarianism is that it ignores, or at least does not do full justice to, the notion of personal responsibility or sense of obligation. If the only duty or requirement is to produce some obscure sense of the "greatest good" or the "greatest happiness," the question of how the good is identified and who is to have the good remains unanswered by the traditional utilitarian construct. ;The classical view of utilitarianism is too broad in its scope of defining "the greatest good" or realm of value. But to narrow the area of value to a particular sphere or environment allows for the utility and associated rights in question to be identified, the value measured, and the success more easily interpreted. ;While maintaining the general premise of utilitarianism, that is, "the greatest good for the greatest number," the notion is not from some nebulous concept or subjective position about life or feelings in general. This sphere-specific position also acknowledges and defines the "rights" of the individual within the particular sphere being considered, in this case, the sphere of health care

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideal Utilitarianism.Susan Mary Kozal Brennan - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Iowa
A non-utilitarian approach to punishment.H. J. McCloskey - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):249 – 263.
Rights and Utilitarianism.Jan Narveson - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (sup1):137-160.
Rights and Utilitarianism.Jan Narveson - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 5:137-160.
Indirect Utility and Fundamental Rights.John Gray - 1984 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (2):73.
Equal Freedom and Utility: Herbert Spencer's Liberal Utilitarianism (review).Daniel E. Palmer - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (4):685-686.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
13 (#288,494)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references