A Case for Philosophical Pluralism: The Problem of Intentionality

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 40:19-32 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In what sense can we speak of pluralism regarding the philosophical traditions or styles crudely characterised as ‘Continental’ and ‘Analytic’? Do these traditions address the same philosophical problems in different ways, or pose different problems altogether? What, if anything, do these traditions share?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy and Pluralism.Dermot Moran - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Intentionality: Some Lessons from the History of the Problem from Brentano to the Present.Dermot Moran - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (3):317-358.
Editorial.Dermot Moran - 1988 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 32:11-14.
Introduction to Phenomenology.Dermot Moran - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):649-651.
Editorial.Dermot Moran - 2001 - Humana Mente 9 (3):289-290.
Editorial.Dermot Moran - 1993 - Humana Mente 1 (1):7-9.
First page preview.Dermot Moran - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1).
Poetique du possible. [REVIEW]Dermot Moran - 1986 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 31:555-557.
Proclus’s Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides. [REVIEW]Dermot Moran - 1989 - Irish Philosophical Journal 6 (1):164-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
20 (#752,463)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dermot Moran
Boston College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references