Ontology, Reduction, and the Unity of Science

The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:19-27 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ontology should be conceived as supervenient on scientific theories. They tell us what categories of things there really are. Thus, we would have a unique system of ontology if we would attain the unity of science through a reductionist program. For this, it should be clear how a relation of intertheoretical reduction (with ontological implications) is to be conceived. A formal proposal is laid out in this paper. This allows us also to define the notion of a fundamental theory. Now, it appears that, considering the state of really existing science, the idea of reductionism as based on this explication is highly implausible. However, even if this is the case, the question whether it is possible to build up a unique ontological system remains open. Its resolution depends on the notion of compatibility between fundamental theories, and its application to existing theories and their empirical bases.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science and Ontology.Yvonne Raley - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:143-147.
Science and Ontology.Yvonne Raley - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:143-147.
An analysis of intertheoretical connections in the interdisciplinary field.Steve Hendra - 2020 - Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
The Ontology of Time in Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science.Vadim N. Zima - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 62:163-167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
9 (#1,281,906)

6 months
110 (#43,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references