Models of man: Neoclassical, behavioural, and evolutionary


Abstract
For most observers of economics from both inside and outside the science, the term ‘economics’ is synonymous with neoclassical economics. It is the methodology of neoclassical economics that defines the discipline of economics. ‘Mainstream economics’ is neoclassical economics and anyone entering the discipline today who wishes to obtain an appointment at one of the leading universities of the world is well advised to master its techniques. The fact that virtually every winner of a Nobel prize from Paul Samuelson up to his student Joseph Stiglitz has been a practitioner of neoclassical economics is ample proof of the methodology’s triumph. Despite the dominance of this methodology, however, neoclassical economics has been subject to a steady stream of criticisms and proposals for alternative methodological approaches throughout its life. This article focuses on two relatively recent challenges to the neoclassical orthodoxy that seem to have taken hold of a non-negligible minority of the profession, some of whom can be found at leading universities. These two challenges come from behavioural economics and evolutionary economics. The article describes the strengths and weaknesses of both of these methodological approaches and contrasts them with that of neoclassical economics. It concludes that all three methodologies have something positive to contribute to the study of human behaviour. Key Words: neoclassical economics • behavioural economics • evolutionary economics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X04039982
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,066
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Unrealistic Assumptions in Rational Choice Theory.Aki Lehtinen & Jaakko Kuorikoski - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (2):115-138.
Authority and Democracy in Corporate Governance?J. van Oosterhout - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 71 (4):359-370.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
65 ( #116,005 of 2,236,361 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #585,669 of 2,236,361 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature