Analysis 74 (2):232-233 (2014)

Authors
F. A. Muller
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Abstract
In this journal, Brogaard and Marlow recently argued that the relativity of simultaneity is an illusion. We claim their argument is fallacious.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anu037
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Past, Present, Future, and Special Relativity.Natasa Rakic - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):257-280.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Causality and Temporal Order in Special Relativity.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):459-479.
Simultaneity as an Invariant Equivalence Relation.Marco Mamone-Capria - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (11):1365-1383.
A New Look at Simultaneity.Kent A. Peacock - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:542 - 552.
The Sui Generis Conventionality of Simultaneity.Laurent A. Beauregard - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (4):469-490.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-25

Total views
105 ( #87,126 of 2,333,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #256,625 of 2,333,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes