- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Deductivism Surpassed: Or, Foxing in its Margins? [Book Review]
Abstract
John Fox argued that deductivism must be supplemented with ‘epistemic syllogisms’, non-deductive arguments whose vindication is trivial if deductivism is correct. I resist this attempt to surpass deductivismMy notes
Similar books and articles
Deductivism as an interpretative strategy: A reply to Groarke's defense of reconstructive deductivism.David Godden - 2005 - Argumentation and Advocacy: Journal of the American Forensic Association 41:168-183.
The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction.Fábio Perin Shecaira - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (4):471-501.
Certainty and Error in Mathematics: Deductivism and the Claims of Mathematical Fallibilism.Ian J. Dove - 2004 - Dissertation, Rice University
Relevance logic brings hope to hypothetico-deductivism.C. Kenneth Waters - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):453-464.
Deduction without Dogmas:The Case of Moral Analogical Argumentation.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (3):311-336.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-02-19
Downloads
67 (#249,240)
6 months
10 (#308,815)
2012-02-19
Downloads
67 (#249,240)
6 months
10 (#308,815)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Changing Philosophy Through Technology: Complexity and Computer-Supported Collaborative Argument Mapping.Michael H. G. Hoffmann - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (2):167-188.
Abduction, Complex Inferences, and Emergent Heuristics of Scientific Inquiry.John R. Shook - 2016 - Axiomathes 26 (2):157-186.
References found in this work
Mill's sins or Mayo's errors?Peter Achinstein - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press.
Induction and Severe Testing.Peter Achinstein - 2010 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos (eds.), Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kftwx uwo