- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Dead Donor Rule Is Not Morally Sufficient
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):57-59 (2023)
Abstract
Nielsen Busch and Mjaaland (2023) argue that controlled donation after cardiac death (cDCD) protocols prescribe the extraction of organs that do not violate the dead donor rule. I argue here that e...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Almagest Again? An Epistemological Critique of Nielsen Busch and Mjaaland.David Kaufman, Michael J. Nabozny & Margie Hodges Shaw - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):33-35.
Protecting Life and Ensuring Death—Confounding the Dead Donor Rule.Adam Omelianchuk - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):20-22.
The Dead Donor Rule Does Require that the Donor is Dead.Lainie Ross - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):12-14.
Defining the Cause of Death and Vitality of Organs in the Ethical Analysis of Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Procedures.Giuliano Testa & Anji Wall - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):35-38.
Cerebral Circulatory Arrest and the Dead Donor Rule.Christos Lazaridis - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):43-45.
Does Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Violate the Dead Donor Rule?Emil J. Nielsen Busch & Marius T. Mjaaland - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):4-11.
Death Lost in Translation.Daniel P. Sulmasy & Anne L. Dalle Ave - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):17-19.
Donors and Organs at the Borders of Vitality and Public Trust: Why DCD Donors Must Be Dead and Not Dying.John P. Lizza & Aasim Padela - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):53-55.
Not Dead, but Close Enough? You Cannot Have Your Cake and Eat It Too in Satisfying the DDR in cDCD.Brendan Parent & Tamar Schiff - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):22-24.
The Dead Donor Rule, Reversibility and Donor Wishes.Stephen R. Latham & Ramesh K. Batra - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):31-32.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-01-23
Downloads
21 (#761,941)
6 months
9 (#355,594)
2023-01-23
Downloads
21 (#761,941)
6 months
9 (#355,594)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
What is Death and Why Do We Insist on the Dead Donor Rule? A Response to Our Critics.Emil J. Busch & Marius T. Mjaaland - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):8-12.
References found in this work
Does Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death Violate the Dead Donor Rule?Emil J. Nielsen Busch & Marius T. Mjaaland - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):4-11.
Doing harm: living organ donors, clinical research and The Tenth Man.C. Elliott - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):91-96.
The Dead Donor Rule and Means-End Reasoning - A Reply to Gardiner and Sparrow.Stephen Napier - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):134-140.
The Dead Donor Rule and Means-End Reasoning.Robert Sparrow - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):141-146.
Medical experimentation, informed consent and using people.de An Cocking & Ju Stin Oakley - 1994 - Bioethics 8 (4):293-311.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-kfj6z uwo