Abortion: Supreme Court Avoids Disturbing Abortion Precedents by Ruling on Grounds of Remedy – Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):469-471 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On January 18, 2006, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that the constitutional challenge to New Hampshire's Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act would be remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, to determine whether the Court of Appeals could, consistent with New Hampshire's legislative intent, formulate a narrower remedy than a permanent injunction against enforcement of the parental notification law in its entirety.In 2003, New Hampshire enacted the Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act. The Act specifies, in pertinent part, that “No abortion shall be performed upon an unemancipated minor or upon a female for whom a guardian or conservator has been appointed… until at least 48 hours after written notice of the pending abortion has been delivered....” The Act allows for three exceptions where a physician may perform an abortion on a minor child without parental or guardian notification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fetal Sentience and Women's Rights.Bonnie Steinbock - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):49-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
21 (#133,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

N. W. Law
Hong Kong Baptist University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references