David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 51 (4):677-684 (1984)
Jaynes contends that in many statistical problems a seemingly indeterminate probability distribution is made unique by the transformation group of necessarily implied invariance properties, thereby justifying the principle of indifference. To illustrate and substantiate his claims he considers Bertrand's Paradox. These assertions are here refuted and the traditional attitude is vindicated
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Uffink (1996). The Constraint Rule of the Maximum Entropy Principle. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 27 (1):47-79.
Cliff Ermatinger (2005). Common Nonsense: 25 Fallacies About Life (and Their Solutions). Circle Press.
Andrew Newman, The Bundle Theory, the Principle of Unity for Elementary Particulars, and Some Issues.
Nicholas Shackel (2007). Bertrand's Paradox and the Principle of Indifference. Philosophy of Science 74 (2):150-175.
Peter Milne (1993). The Foundations of Probability and Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (2):129 - 168.
Shelly Kagan (1998). Rethinking Intrinsic Value. Journal of Ethics 2 (4):277-297.
Louis Marinoff (1994). A Resolution of Bertrand's Paradox. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):1-24.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #233,023 of 1,925,791 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,414 of 1,925,791 )
How can I increase my downloads?