A comparison of verbal, manual, and conditioned-response methods in the determination of auditory intensity thresholds

Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (4):401 (1936)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0056253

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):35.
Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: I. The conditioned eyelid response to light.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (6):690.
Intensity of conditioned stimulus and rate of conditioning.L. F. Carter - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (6):481.
On the heterogeneity of stimulus and response elements in the processing of information.William C. Howell - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (3):235.
Effects of ready signal condition on acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Louis E. Price, William E. Vandament & David W. Abbott - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):516.
Backward conditioned eyelid reactions.H. Cason - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (5):599.
Differential eyelid conditioning as a function of the frequency and intensity of auditory CSs.John W. Moore - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (3):250.
Age differences in the acquisition and extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.Harry W. Braun & Richard Geiselhart - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (6):386.
Acquisition and extinction of human eyelid conditioned response as a function of schedule of reinforcement and unconditioned stimulus intensity under two masked conditioning procedures.Bryce C. Schurr & Willard N. Runquist - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):398.
Effects of differential instructions, differential feedback, and ucs intensity on the conditioned-eyelid response.Harold D. Fishbein - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
14 (#996,581)

6 months
2 (#1,445,320)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references