ERISA: U.S. Supreme Court Holds Treatment Decisions Made by HMO Physician-Employees Do Not Breach Fiduciary Duty

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):309-311 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

ERISA and RICO: New Tools for HMO Litigators.Elaine T. Moore - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (1):83-88.
ERISA and RICO: New Tools for HMO Litigators.Elaine T. Moore - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (1):83-85.
ERISA: No Preemption of State's HMO Law Requiring Independent Physician Review.Tal Sapeika - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):407-408.
ERISA: No Preemption of State's HMO Law Requiring Independent Physician Review.Tal Sapeika - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4):407-409.
Supreme Court Limits Scope of ERISA Preemption.R. H. J. - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (4):407-407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references