Economic Thought 1 (2) (2012)

Abstract
Adam Smith rejected Mandeville's invisible-hand doctrine of 'private vices, publick benefits'. In The Theory of Moral Sentiments his model of the 'impartial spectator' is driven not by sympathy for other people, but by their approbation. The innate capacity for sympathy makes approbation credible. Approbation needs to be authenticated, and in Smith's model authentication relies on innate virtue, which is not realistic. An alternative model of 'regard' makes use of signalling and is more pragmatic. Modern versions of the invisible hand in rational choice theory and neo- liberalism are shown to be radical departures from the ethical legacy of Enlightenment and utilitarian economics, and are not consistent with Adam Smith's own position.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Adam Smith - 1759 - Dover Publications.
Capitalism and Freedom.Milton Friedman - 1962 - Ethics 74 (1):70-72.
The Nature and Scope of Rational-Choice Explanations.Jon Elster - 1985 - In Ernest LePore & Brian P. McLaughlin (eds.). Blackwell. pp. 60-72.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Classical Liberalism: The Foundation for a New Economics?Victoria Bateman - 2016 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 28 (3-4):440-460.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Adam Smith's Invisible Hand Argument.John D. Bishop - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (3):165 - 180.
God and the Market: Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand. [REVIEW]Paul Oslington - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (4):429 - 438.
Marcus Aurelius, the Stoic Ethic, and Adam Smith.Harold B. Jones - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):89 - 96.
Invisible Hand Arguments: Milton Friedman and Adam Smith.Alistair M. Macleod - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (2):103-117.
Adam Smith’s Marketplace of Life.James R. Otteson - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-03-12

Total views
48 ( #213,782 of 2,428,027 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #229,124 of 2,428,027 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes