- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On flattening elimination rules
Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):60-72 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Inversion by definitional reflection and the admissibility of logical rules.Wagner Campos Sanz & Thomas Piecha - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):550-569.
Inversion by definitional reflection and the admissibility of logical rules: Inversion by definitional reflection.Wagner De Campos Sanz - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):550-569.
P. SCHROEDER-HEISTER and K. DOŠEN "Substructural Logics". [REVIEW]A. Urquhart - 1995 - History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (1):138.
Reinhard Kahle and Peter Schroeder-heister.Steven Weinstein, Substantive General Covariance & Eugen Fischer - 2006 - Synthese 148 (1):745-747.
Normalizability, cut eliminability and paradox.Neil Tennant - 2016 - Synthese 199 (Suppl 3):597-616.
Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.) - 2024 - Springer.
The Validity of Inference and Argument.Dag Prawitz - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 135-160.
Definitional Reflection and Basic Logic.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (4):491-501.
Paradoxes, Intuitionism, and Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Reinhard Kahle & Paulo Guilherme Santos - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 363-374.
Intensional Harmony as Isomorphism.Paolo Pistone & Luca Tranchini - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 315-337.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-27
Downloads
35 (#445,427)
6 months
6 (#700,872)
2014-01-27
Downloads
35 (#445,427)
6 months
6 (#700,872)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.) - 2024 - Springer.
Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Peter Schroeder-Heister & Thomas Piecha (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Characterizing generics are material inference tickets: a proof-theoretic analysis.Preston Stovall - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (5):668-704.
Semantic pollution and syntactic purity.Stephen Read - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):649-661.
References found in this work
The Logical Basis of Metaphysics.Michael Dummett, Hilary Putnam & James Conant - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (177):519-527.
A natural extension of natural deduction.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1284-1300.
General-Elimination Harmony and the Meaning of the Logical Constants.Stephen Read - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (5):557-576.
A Note on Harmony.Nissim Francez & Roy Dyckhoff - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):613-628.
Natural deduction with general elimination rules.Jan von Plato - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (7):541-567.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo