Cornell University Press (2018)

Abstract
In this highly original account of Bishop George Berkeley's epistemological and metaphysical theories, George S. Pappas seeks to determine precisely what doctrines the philosopher held and what arguments he put forward to support them. Specifically, Pappas overturns accepted opinions about Berkeley's famous attack on the Lockean doctrine of abstract ideas. Berkeley's criticism of these ideas had been thought relevant only to his views on language and to his nominalism; Pappas persuasively argues that Berkeley's ideas about abstraction are crucial to nearly all of the fundamental principles that he defends. Pappas demonstrates how an adequate appreciation of Berkeley's views on abstraction can lead to an improved understanding of his important principle of esse is percipi, and of the arguments Berkeley proposes in support of this principle. Pappas also takes up Berkeley's widely rejected claim to be a philosopher of common sense. He assesses the validity of this self-description and considers why Berkeley might have chosen to align himself with a commonsense position. Pappas shows how three core concepts—abstraction, perception, and common sense—are central to and interdependent in the work of one of the major figures of early modern Western thought.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
Buy this book $75.68 used   $85.95 new   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9781501729317   0801437008   1501729314
DOI 10.7591/9781501729317
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Berkeley on Inconceivability and Impossibility.Thomas Holden - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (1):107-122.
Locke, Arnauld, and Abstract Ideas.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (1):75-94.
How Berkeley's Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):553-576.
Ideas and Explanation in Early Modern Philosophy.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2021 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103 (2):252-280.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Berkeley’s Thought.George Sotiros Pappas - 2000 - Cornell University Press.
Berkeley’s Thought. [REVIEW]Lex Newman - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (2):314-318.
Berkeley’s Thought. [REVIEW]Lex Newman - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (2):314-318.
Book Review. [REVIEW]Michael Newman - 1990 - British Journal of Aesthetics 30 (4):390-392.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Jay Newman, Martin A. Bertman & Finngeir Hiorth - 1992 - Philosophia 21 (3-4):339-349.
George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man.David Berman - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach.Georges Dicker - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):517–535.
Segno E Linguaggio in George Berkeley.Paolo F. Mugnai - 1979 - Edizioni Dell'ateneo & Bizzarri.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-01-31

Total views
6 ( #1,102,754 of 2,449,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,478 of 2,449,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes