Emotion Review 4 (3):247-248 (2012)
Abstract |
Comparison of human and animal emotions reveals a fuzzy yet discernible boundary. Their undeniable similarities are more aptly described as ur-emotions than as basic emotions. This article describes how the concept of ur-emotion can be useful to animal researchers as well as to social constructionists by making sense of emotional variation both across species and across cultures
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/1754073912439786 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Basic Emotions or Ur-Emotions?Nico H. Frijda & W. Gerrod Parrott - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (4):406-415.
Basic Emotions: A Reconstruction.William A. Mason & John P. Capitanio - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (3):238-244.
The Sophistication of Non-Human Emotion.Robert C. Roberts - 2009 - In Robert W. Lurz (ed.), The Philosophy of Animal Minds. Cambridge University Press. pp. 145--164.
Ur-Emotions and Your Emotions: Reconceptualizing Basic Emotion.W. Gerrod Parrott - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (1):14-21.
Citations of this work BETA
Emotions and Morality: The View From Classical Antiquity.David Konstan - 2015 - Topoi 34 (2):401-407.
Basic Emotions: A Rejoinder.William A. Mason & John P. Capitanio - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (3):251-252.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-02
Total views
35 ( #327,449 of 2,519,513 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,550 of 2,519,513 )
2013-11-02
Total views
35 ( #327,449 of 2,519,513 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,550 of 2,519,513 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads