Virtuous Imbalance: Political Philosophy Between Desirability and Feasibility

Routledge (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Which kind of methodology should political philosophy endorse to jointly meet its theoretical and practical commitments? Virtuous Imbalance: Political Philosophy between Desirability and Feasibility assesses three paradigmatic cases to explore and explain political philosophy's attempts to answer this important question. Rawls's realistic utopianism, Machiavelli's realism, and Plato's utopianism are examined and explored as Francesca Pasquali presents the proper methodology political philosophy should endorse when attempting to attain equilibrium between the practical and the theoretical.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Political Arguments Against Utopianism.Roger Paden - 1999 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (1):7-17.
Being realistic and demanding the impossible.Enzo Rossi - 2019 - Constellations 26 (4):638-652.
Feasibility beyond Non-ideal Theory: a Realist Proposal.Ilaria Cozzaglio & Greta Favara - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (3):417-432.
Political realism and the relationship between ideal and non-ideal theory.Greta Favara - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (3):376-397.
Probing the Limits of Rawls’s Realistic Utopia.Annette Förster - 2016 - Social Philosophy and Policy 33 (1-2):334-353.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
8 (#1,336,469)

6 months
2 (#1,448,741)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francesca Pasquali
Università degli Studi di Milano

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references