A reply to Rescher on Goodman's 'about'

Mind 74 (296):592-593 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/mind/lxxiv.296.592

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Reply to Rescher on Goodman's "About".T. E. Patton - 1965 - Mind 74:592.
Thomas E. Patton.Syntactic Deviance - forthcoming - Foundations of Language.
A Reply to James Marcum’s “What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis?”.Moti Mizrahi - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (11):21-24.
Reply to Professor Patton.P. F. Strawson - 1976 - Philosophical Books 17 (1):6-9.
Corollary to Goodman's explication of 'about'.J. S. Ullian - 1962 - Mind 71 (284):545.
The Role of Evidence in Judging Kuhn’s Model: On the Mizrahi, Patton, Marcum Exchange.Vasso Kindi - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (11):25-33.
Solving Goodman's paradox: A reply to Stemmer. [REVIEW]Kenneth Konyndyk - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (3):297 - 305.
Reply to Mr. Rescher.Alan Ross Anderson - 1962 - Philosophical Studies 13 (1/2):6 - 8.
Constitutive Luck.Andrew Latus - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (4):460-475.
The convertibility of symbols: A reply to Goodman's critics.V. A. Howard - 1975 - British Journal of Aesthetics 15 (3):207-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#132,620)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references