A Simple Formalization And Proof For The Mutilated Chess Board

Logic Journal of the IGPL 9 (3):475-485 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The impossibility of tiling the mutilated chess board has been formalized and verified using Isabelle. The formalization is concise because it is expressed using inductive definitions. The proofs are straightforward except for some lemmas concerning finite cardinalities. This exercise is an object lesson in choosing a good formalization: one at the right level of abstraction

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Limitations of formalization.Constantine Politis - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):356-360.
The reviled art.Stuart Rachels - 2008 - In Benjamin Hale (ed.), Philosophy Looks at Chess. Open Court Press.
Chess, Imagination, and Perceptual Understanding.Paul Coates - 2013 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 73:211-242.
How intellectual is chess? -- a reply to Howard.Merim Bilalić & Peter Mcleod - 2006 - Journal of Biosocial Science 38 (3):419-421.
Proofs and epistemic structure.Glen Helman - 1992 - In Michael Detlefsen (ed.), Proof, Logic and Formalization. London, England: Routledge. pp. 24.
Domains of Sciences, Universes of Discourse and Omega Arguments.Jose M. Saguillo - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):267-290.
Formalization and infinity.André Porto - 2008 - Manuscrito 31 (1):25-43.
A Finitely Axiomatized Formalization of Predicate Calculus with Equality.Norman D. Megill - 1995 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (3):435-453.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
6 (#1,459,986)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references