| Abstract |
In his keynote address at a recent Intelligent Design (ID) conference at Biola University, ID leader William Dembski began by quoting "a well-known ID sympathizer" whom he had asked to assess the current state of the ID movement. Dembski explained that he had asked because, "after some initial enthusiasm on his part three years ago, his interest seemed to have flagged" (Dembski 2002). The sympathizer replied that..
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
References found in this work BETA
Naturalism, Evidence and Creationism: The Case of Phillip Johnson. [REVIEW]Robert T. Pennock - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):543-559.
Reply to My Critics: A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. [REVIEW]Michael J. Behe - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):683-707.
Finding Darwin's God: A Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution.Kenneth R. Miller - 2002 - Journal of the History of Biology 35 (1):181-183.
Citations of this work BETA
Can’T Philosophers Tell the Difference Between Science and Religion?: Demarcation Revisited.Robert Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism.Robert T. Pennock - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):757-778.
The Non-Epistemology of Intelligent Design: Its Implications for Public Policy.Barbara Forrest - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):331 - 379.
Creationism and Intelligent Design.Robert T. Pennock - 2003 - Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 4:143-163.
Is Science Metaphysically Neutral?Iris Fry - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (3):665-673.
View all 7 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence.William A. Dembski - 2002 - Rowman & Littlefield.
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.
Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA - Edited by William A. Dembski and Michael Ruse. [REVIEW]Kevin Davey - 2006 - Philosophical Books 47 (4):383-386.
Becoming a Disciplined Science: Prospects, Pitfalls, and Reality Check for ID.William A. Dembski - unknown
Information Theory, Evolutionary Computation, and Dembski’s “Complex Specified Information”.Wesley Elsberry & Jeffrey Shallit - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):237 - 270.
Scientific Content, Testability, and the Vacuity of Intelligent Design Theory.Ryan Nichols - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):591-611.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-06-24
Total views
50 ( #226,412 of 2,505,164 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,164 )
2011-06-24
Total views
50 ( #226,412 of 2,505,164 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,164 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
