Simplicity tracks truth because compression tracks probability

Abstract

The simplicity of a theory seems closely related to how well the theory summarizes individual data points. Think, for example, of classic curve-fitting. It is easy to get perfect data-fit with a ‘‘theory’’ that simply lists each point of data, but such a theory is maximally unsimple (for the data-fit). The simple theory suggests instead that there is one underlying curve that summarizes this data, and we usually prefer such a theory even at some expense in data-fit. In general, it seems, theorizing involves looking for regularities or patterns in our experience, and such regularities are interesting to us because they summarize how our experience goes. We could list all the ravens we’ve encountered, and their colors, or we could summarize..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Why favour simplicity?Roger White - 2005 - Analysis 65 (3):205–210.
Truth: A Multiple-Fit Theory.Joško Žanić - 2009 - Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):327-336.
Aesthetic fields—Null theory II.M. Muraskin - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (1):93-100.
Wofür sprechen die daten?Thomas Bartelborth - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (1):13-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#372,384)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Petersen
Niagara University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references