Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):289 – 317 (2000)
This paper presents an 'internal' criticism of Winch's seminal 'Understanding a Primitive Society'. It distinguishes between two contrasting approaches to critical social understanding: (1) the metaphysical approach, central to the whole tradition of critical philosophy and critical social theory from Kant, through Marx to the Frankfurt School and contemporary theorists such as Habermas and Searle; (2) the descriptive approach, advocated by Winch, and which derives from Wittgenstein's critique of philosophical theory. It is argued, against a long tradition of 'critical theory' depicting Wittgenstein's philosophy as irredeemably 'conservative', that the descriptive approach is perfectly apt for generating a critical understanding of central Western institutions. Rather than seeking to provide an explanatory theory through which to discern what allegedly is imperceptible to theoretically unaided perception (i.e. the metaphysical approach), the descriptive approach aims for a 'perspicuous presentation' of our everyday practices and institutions in such a way as to see their 'irrational' and 'alienating' dimensions. Winch's basic position in 'Understanding a Primitive Society' is endorsed, but it is argued that ultimately he fails in his descriptive intent. In place of the Christian prayer analogy that Winch invokes in order to make sense of Zande witchcraft, it is proposed that Western commodity production and exchange provide a more appropriate, instructive, and critical comparison.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Rethinking Social Criticism: Rules, Logic and Internal Critique.Stephen Kemp - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):61-84.
In Defence of Language-Interpretive Social Science: On the Critiques of Peter Winch's Conception of Understanding.Akos Sivado - 2011 - History of the Human Sciences 24 (5):103-123.
Similar books and articles
Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch: Constitutive Orders of Sensemaking.Anne Warfield Rawls - 2011 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (4):396-418.
Value and Understanding: Essays for Peter Winch.Peter Winch & Raimond Gaita (eds.) - 1990 - Routledge.
Forms of Our Life: Wittgenstein and the Later Heidegger.Michael Weston - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (3):245-265.
Iv. Understanding Peter Winch.W. W. Sharrock & R. J. Anderson - 1985 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):119 – 122.
Sobre Las Condiciones de la Comprension Transcultural (on the Conditions of Transcultural Understanding).Julián Marrades - 1996 - Theoria 11 (1):161-183.
Rationality, Relativism, and Religion: A Reinterpretation of Peter Winch. [REVIEW]Kevin Schilbrack - 2009 - Sophia 48 (4):399-412.
Can Social Science Be Just?John Gilbert Gunnell - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4):595-621.
Autonomy, Critical Thinking and the Wittgensteinian Legacy: Reflections on Christopher Winch, Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking.Harvey Siegel - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):165-184.
Kritische Sprechakttheorie oder Semiotik der Macht? Habermas und die Wittgenstein-Tradition.Herbert Kögler - 1996 - Wittgenstein-Studien 3 (1).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #133,001 of 2,171,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,615 of 2,171,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?