Comparative, continuity, and computational evidence in evolutionary theory: Predictive evidence versus productive evidence
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):294-296 (2006)
Of three types of evidence available to evolution theorists – comparative, continuity, and computational – the first is largely productive rather than predictive. Although comparison between extant species or languages is possible and can be suggestive of evolutionary processes, leading to theory development, comparison with extinct species and languages seems necessary for validation. Continuity and computational evidence provide the best opportunities for supporting predictions.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Toward Evidence-Based Evidence: Supporting Forensic Knowledge Claims in the Post-Daubert Era.Simon A. Cole - unknown
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence for G.L.S. Shackle.Guido Fioretti - 2001 - Mind and Society 2 (1):77-98.
Evidence of Evidence is Not (Necessarily) Evidence.Branden Fitelson - 2012 - Analysis 72 (1):85-88.
Prediction and Prejudice.Peter Lipton - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):51 – 65.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #484,424 of 2,154,127 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,154,127 )
How can I increase my downloads?