- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
I am grateful for the thoughtful paper by these authors. However, I would have been helped if they had gone carefully through some examples, because I think many of the difficulties they raise are removed if we consider actual examples in detail. I will do that in this reply. They challenge me to say exactly what I mean [Book Review]
In Jan G. Michel, Dirk Franken & Attila Karakus (eds.), John R. Searle: Thinking about the Real World. Frankfurt: ontos/de Gruyter. pp. 225 (2010)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Trivial, Platitudinous, Boring? Searle on Conceptual Relativism.Markus Seidel & Arne Weber - 2010 - In Jan G. Michel, Dirk Franken & Attila Karakus (eds.), John R. Searle: Thinking about the Real World. Frankfurt: ontos/de Gruyter.
Some concerns with Polger and Shapiro’s view.Mark Couch - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):419-430.
A Reply to Joseph C. Flay’s “Hegel’s Metaphysics”.Stephen Houlgate - 1993 - The Owl of Minerva 24 (2):153-161.
Reply to Deng, Hesse and Gäb.Robin Le Poidevin - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):203-213.
Minds, machines, and Searle 2: What's right and wrong about the chinese room argument.Stevan Harnad - 2002 - In John Mark Bishop & John Preston (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. London: Oxford University Press.
John R. Searle: Thinking about the Real World.Jan G. Michel, Dirk Franken & Attila Karakus (eds.) - 2010 - Frankfurt: ontos/de Gruyter.
Reply to Margolis, Madelrieux and Levine.Cheryl Misak - 2013 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 5 (2).
What is language : some preliminary remarks.John R. Searle - 1996 - In Raffaela Giovagnoli (ed.), Etica E Politica. Clarendon Press. pp. 173-202.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-28
Downloads
20 (#758,804)
6 months
1 (#1,722,086)
2014-01-28
Downloads
20 (#758,804)
6 months
1 (#1,722,086)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-xdvnm uwo