Extreme Prematurity and Parental Rights after Baby Doe: The Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 Established the Norms for Treating Disabled Newborns, but They Did Not Address the Treatment of Premature Babies. Parents and Physicians Need a Framework for Decisionmaking. A Decision Handed Down Recently by the Texas Supreme Court Is a Step Forward

Hastings Center Report 34 (4):32 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 established the norms for treating disabled newborns, but they did not address the treatment of premature babies. Parents and physicians need a framework for decisionmaking. A decision handed down recently by the Texas Supreme Court is a step forward.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2012

DOI

10.2307/3528691

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Extreme prematurity and parental rights after baby Doe.John A. Robertson - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (4):32-39.
Parens patriae jurisdiction and religious beliefs of parents in medical treatment of a minor: Examining the Supreme Court’s decision in Tega Esabunor v Faweya & Ors (2019) LPELR 46961 (SC) in light of international practice. [REVIEW]U. Anyamele - 2023 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 16 (1):29-31.
Severely Disabled Newborns.Eike-Henner W. Kluge - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 274–285.
Force Majeure : Justification for Active Termination of Life in the Case of Severely Handicapped Newborns after Forgoing Treatment.H. J. J. Leenen & Chris Ciesielski-Carlucci - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (3):271.
Parental refusal of medical treatment for a newborn.John J. Paris, Michael D. Schreiber & Michael P. Moreland - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):427-441.
Treating Baby Doe: The Ethics of Uncertainty.Nancy K. Rhoden - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (4):34-42.
The Marginally Viable Newborn: Legal Challenges, Conceptual Inadequacies, and Reasonableness.Sadath A. Sayeed - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):600-610.
When the Bough Breaks: Parental Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making in Nicu.Winifred J. Ellenchild Pinch - 2002 - Upa.
Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie Gard case.John J. Paris, Brian M. Cummings, Michael P. Moreland & Jason N. Batten - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):443-447.
Law and the Life Sciences: Parents, Children, and the Supreme Court.George J. Annas - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (5):21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
31 (#107,547)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references