Recognition and Diagnosis from the Perspective of an Anthropological Philosophy of Culture

Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 2 (4):89-99 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of my article is to analyze the concepts and phenomena of diagnosis and recognition, often considered to be semantically identical. While in psychiatric practice such an identity does not necessarily have adverse effects, in the anthropological and cultural domains identification of diagnosis and recognition may cause stigmatization, or other undesirable consequences. The article attempts to justify this thesis

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Diagnosis and Symptoms.Zofia Rosińska - 2018 - Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 2 (2):1-4.
Psychiatric Diagnosis as Recognition in Disorder Identified Individuals.Chloe Saunders - 2023 - Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology 30 (3):263-277.
The Political and the Hypostases of the Human. Towards a Recognition Culture.Anton Carpinschi - 2008 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 7 (19):58-93.
The Problem of Recognition in Modern Philosophy: Social and Anthropological Dimensions.L. A. Sytnichenko & D. V. Usov - 2023 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 23:133-145.
Is there androcentric bias in psychiatric diagnosis?Sue V. Rosser - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):215-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
8 (#1,336,069)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references