The achievement of neglect and the ontology of artworks
of (from British Columbia Philosophy Graduate Conference) The paper seeks to reconcile a folk sentiment and a commonplace within aesthetics that may be in tension: The sentiment that our creations can sustain beyond our own lifetimes as a legacy of our lives and the commonplace that some artworks can be made, and exist as artworks within an artist’s mind, without being articulated in a publicly accessible medium. It does this through denying that artworks can exist as the content of thoughts, and argues that in order to have determinate existence and individuation conditions, all artworks, irrespective of art form need to be articulated in a communicable form. The paper interprets this argument within a framework noting the difference between a work being neglected and falling into oblivion, concluding that an artwork does not exist until it meets the conditions for neglect, separate from its author’s existence.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Instructions and Artworks: Musical Scores, Theatrical Scripts, Architectural Plans, and Screenplays.Ted Nannicelli - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (4):399-414.
Categories and Comparisons of Artworks.H. J. Pratt - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):45-59.
Environmental Art and Ecological Citizenship.Jason Simus - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (1):21-36.
The Problem of Non-Perceptual Art.James Shelley - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):363-378.
The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics.John Dilworth - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #435,395 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,246 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?